Select country
Membership information
0800 561 9000
Dentolegal advice
0800 561 1010
Menu
Refine my search


We often see the psychological impact GDC investigations have on the dental professionals involved as well as on their family, their reputation and their career.

We recently surveyed Dental Protection members who faced a GDC investigation between 2018-22 to get a better understanding of their experience, the impact on their mental health, and where improvements could be made.

125 members responded to the survey and nearly all of those (96%) said the GDC investigation caused stress/anxiety. 73% said it impacted on their personal life and more than 8 in 10 (82%) said that the investigation had a detrimental impact on their mental health.

14% of the 125 doctors surveyed left dentistry due to the investigation, and a further 38% considered leaving. Worryingly, over a quarter (28%) said they experienced suicidal thoughts during the investigation.

The GDC and the Department of Health and Social Care both have a part to play in bringing about improvements to the investigation process and communications, and ultimately reducing the impact on dental professionals’ mental health. Some key themes emerged in the survey, and through the anonymous commentary left by the those who participated. Our recommendations, set out below, align to those themes.

Expert instruction often relies on word of mouth. Moreover, the barriers to undertaking expert work (including time constraints, and a wariness of and unfamiliarity with the legal system) mean that expert work is often picked up by dentists in the latter part of their careers, some of whom have retired from clinical practice. Acting as a dental expert is a realistic career option for dentists and should be recognised as a prestigious achievement. Individuals should be encouraged and supported to undertake training to be able to act as expert witnesses. Everyone from regulators and employers to the dental profession can benefit from and play a part in the process.

The aim of our work here is to make recommendations to increase the pool of high-quality experts with appropriate clinical experience and training. Although systems issues and human factors are known to contribute to clinical errors, they are rarely discussed in reports. This is why we also want to encourage experts to comment on these factors and to what extent they may have contributed to the clinical outcomes under scrutiny.

Process too adversarial

60% of respondents said that if the process was less legalistic/adversarial it would have been less stressful

Over a third (34%) say less legalistic language in communications would have made the process less stressful.

“GDC investigation is the most distressful situation I faced in my life. The wait to go through the stages of their investigation is what takes most of the toll. The way it is set up assumes that you are guilty unless proven innocent.”

“I think that patient complaints to the GDC should be directed to a local resolution team initially because I am sure that the majority could be resolved at this stage.  Or if remedial training/monitoring is required this can be provided locally.”  

Recommendations:

  • We welcome the commitment from the GDC via Shifting the balance to review the relationship between the GDC and DCS to ensure that only those matters that are sufficiently serious, and fall within the GDC’s scope, are referred to the GDC. We would encourage the GDC to continue ensuring only serious matters are referred and investigated by the GDC. This will help to avoid unnecessary referrals, deliver a swifter and more appropriate resolution for both parties, and avoid the stress that comes with a protracted, adversarial investigation.

 

Tone of communications

74% of respondents said that they felt the tone of communications from the GDC impacted on their mental health most during the investigation

54% of respondents said that the GDC could adopt a more personable tone in communications to make the process less stressful 

“The GDC were cold and overly harsh on what in my case was a very minor accusation. I had and still have no confidence in the GDC to regulate and punish in an appropriate manner.”

Recommendations:

  • The GDC should work on improving the tone of its communications both at the initial stage but also when a case is closed. It should consider including an acknowledgment of the impact the investigation may have had on the registrant’s mental wellbeing.

 

Initial notification and other practical issues

75% of respondents said that the initial unexpected notification of the investigation from the GDC impacted on their mental health most

35% of respondents said that the GDC could give more frequent updates on how the investigation is progressing to make the process less stressful

“I was sent a text message from someone at the GDC fitness to practise team. They then did not answer the phone when I tried to call them several times that day.”


Recommendations:

  • The GDC should ensure its correspondence is accessible across all devices.  Sending correspondence by way of a link which can only be accessed once, and by which documents cannot be easily saved, also adds to the frustration in an already stressful situation.
  • We welcome the commitment already made by the GDC not to send notifications on Fridays. We invite the GDC to review whether notifications should be sent before mid-day to give registrants time to seek advice, make any queries and reduce their stress levels on the same day.

 

 

 

Unnecessary or vexatious complaints

Many respondents expressed frustration about complaints to the GDC which are malicious, without merit, false or spurious.

“The whole process of GDC complaints needs overhauling. They should be able to differentiate the serious from the trivial.”

“The bar seems so low that almost any complaint, however unsubstantiated initiates a heavy handed and far too lengthy enquiry.”

Recommendations:

  • The GDC should explore more options to discourage complaints that clearly do not require regulatory action, including better communication to the public and profession on the threshold for a complaint.
  • The GDC should acknowledge any stress caused to dental professionals as a result of an investigation which is subsequently found to be based on a vexatious or spurious complaint. An apology for the stress and anxiety caused to the registrant should be considered, reflecting its own guidance to dentists on duty of candour.

 

 

 

Length of the process and lack of expertise

82% of respondents said that they felt the length of the investigation impacted their mental health most during the investigation

75% said that if the process was completed more quickly it would have made it less stressful.

“Thankfully my case did not proceed to a hearing, as it was not substantial enough, but it took almost 3 years to clear, which was an extremely long time!”

“The whole process took a very long time (over 3 years). It affected my future career choices.”

 Recommendations:
  • The GDC should deliver on its 2021 commitment of tackling the issue of delays to fitness to practise cases by using insights to find alternative ways of managing the caseload and increasing the size of the casework team.
  • The GDC should commit to clear timelines for communicating with dental professionals throughout the investigation process and to ensure this happens in a consistent, reliable, and predictable way. This will reduce the stress felt by dental professionals. If they are unable to meet these timelines, the reasons should made known, together with an explanation, as soon as practicable.
  • The GDC should continue to ensure investigators dealing with complaints at an early stage are empowered and suitably experienced, so they have the required expertise to identify and close those cases not requiring further action swiftly. This could reduce the current delays.
  • The Department of Health and Social Care should prioritise legislation to amend the Dentists Act. This would enable the GDC to process complaints more efficiently and close those cases requiring no further action more quickly.

     

    Mental wellbeing support

    Nearly all (96%) said the GDC investigation impacted on stress/anxiety, 80% said it impacted on their health and wellbeing, 73% on their personal life.

    More than 8 in 10 (82%) said the investigation had a detrimental impact on their mental health.

    Over a quarter (28%) of the respondents experienced suicidal thoughts during their investigation.

    Nearly two in five (38%) considered leaving the dental profession and 14% did leave.

“It affected my health and wellbeing in such a serious degree that I had to see my GP and take counselling to be able to cope. I was in serious distress, unable to sleep at night and I could not focus on work or care for my family. I could not find any pleasure in my daily life. I was questioning myself even for the simplest clinical matters. I considered leaving dentistry many times.”

“I am responsible for two children; worrying about my ability to provide almost broke me”.

Recommendations:

  • DC should keep its commitment to publish the data on registrants who have died by suicide during a GDC investigation as soon as possible.  
  • The GDC should review their approach to supporting registrants and consider introducing a support service for dental professionals under investigation. This should also be available to registrants after a case is closed, even when no impairment is found. Extending the support service in this way would also facilitate reflection and learning. Ideally, this should be provided by an independent third party

 

 


New site feature tour

Introducing an improved
online experience

You'll notice a few things have changed on our website. After asking our members what they want in an online platform, we've made it easier to access our membership benefits and created a more personalised user experience.

Why not take our quick 60-second tour? We'll show you how it all works and it should only take a minute.

Take the tour Continue to site

Dentolegal advice
0800 561 1010
Membership information
0800 561 9000

Key contact details

Should you need to contact us, our phone numbers are always visible.

Personalise your search

We'll save your profession in the "I am a..." dropdown filter for next time.

Tour completed

Now you've seen all of the updated features, it's time for you to try them out.

Continue to site
Take again