The oft quoted phrase ‘To err is human‘ originates from the English writer Alexander Pope’s (1688-1744) poem An essay on criticism. However, this idea or concept that mortals are liable to make mistakes was acknowledged as far back as Roman times when Cicero (106-43BC), the great statesman and orator, opined that “Any man can make mistakes, but only an idiot persists in his error.”
Given the fact that humans are fallible, and error is normal, it will come as no surprise that things can and often do go wrong within the world of healthcare – what are variously called patient safety incidents, adverse events, or adverse outcomes. The data would suggest that up to 2% of patients undergoing medical GP consultations1 and 10% of patients in hospitals2 have an adverse outcome, with approximately 50% of these being preventable. Although there is less research, it is highly likely that adverse events and outcomes in dentistry occur frequently as they do in medicine. A study of 1,465 severe incident reports from primary care dentistry in England and Wales identified that 23.6% of errors related to delays in treatment, 15.6% were procedural errors (including wrong tooth extraction) and 11.1% were medication related incidents.3
It is only natural to focus on the adverse outcome itself, but arguably, what is equally if not more important is trying to understand what led up to the error. Such insight can, not only, potentially help the individual clinician avoid a similar issue arising again, but more broadly can enable the profession to address any recurrent themes. So, before considering practical strategies to try and prevent or mitigate errors from happening in dentistry, it is important to understand why, or under what conditions, people make mistakes. An industry keen to understand the answer to this question was aviation, and they have identified 12 key elements that are proven to influence people into making mistakes.4 The so called ‘Dirty Dozen’ is a concept that was developed by Gordon Dupont, in 1993, while he was working for Transport Canada, and formed part of an elementary training programme for Human Performance in Maintenance. Listed in no specific order below, at first blush it is easy to see how each of these factors could contribute to human errors individually, and how in combination they could act to amplify the risk. Let us now briefly look at each of these factors in turn, and how they might relate to the world of dentistry.
1 Gaal et al. 2011
2 Lessing et al. 2010; De Vries et al. 2008
4 https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/The_Human_Factors_%22Dirty_Dozen%22
5 http://www.tac.vic.gov.au/road-safety/safe-driving/tips-and-tools/fighting-fatigue
The oft quoted phrase ‘To err is human‘ originates from the English writer Alexander Pope’s (1688-1744) poem An essay on criticism. However, this idea or concept that mortals are liable to make mistakes was acknowledged as far back as Roman times when Cicero (106-43BC), the great statesman and orator, opined that “Any man can make mistakes, but only an idiot persists in his error.”
Given the fact that humans are fallible, and error is normal, it will come as no surprise that things can and often do go wrong within the world of healthcare – what are variously called patient safety incidents, adverse events, or adverse outcomes. The data would suggest that up to 2% of patients undergoing medical GP consultations1 and 10% of patients in hospitals2 have an adverse outcome, with approximately 50% of these being preventable. Although there is less research, it is highly likely that adverse events and outcomes in dentistry occur frequently as they do in medicine. A study of 1,465 severe incident reports from primary care dentistry in England and Wales identified that 23.6% of errors related to delays in treatment, 15.6% were procedural errors (including wrong tooth extraction) and 11.1% were medication related incidents.3
It is only natural to focus on the adverse outcome itself, but arguably, what is equally if not more important is trying to understand what led up to the error. Such insight can, not only, potentially help the individual clinician avoid a similar issue arising again, but more broadly can enable the profession to address any recurrent themes. So, before considering practical strategies to try and prevent or mitigate errors from happening in dentistry, it is important to understand why, or under what conditions, people make mistakes. An industry keen to understand the answer to this question was aviation, and they have identified 12 key elements that are proven to influence people into making mistakes.4 The so called ‘Dirty Dozen’ is a concept that was developed by Gordon Dupont, in 1993, while he was working for Transport Canada, and formed part of an elementary training programme for Human Performance in Maintenance. Listed in no specific order below, at first blush it is easy to see how each of these factors could contribute to human errors individually, and how in combination they could act to amplify the risk. Let us now briefly look at each of these factors in turn, and how they might relate to the world of dentistry.
1 Gaal et al. 2011
2 Lessing et al. 2010; De Vries et al. 2008
4 https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/The_Human_Factors_%22Dirty_Dozen%22
5 http://www.tac.vic.gov.au/road-safety/safe-driving/tips-and-tools/fighting-fatigue
The oft quoted phrase ‘To err is human‘ originates from the English writer Alexander Pope’s (1688-1744) poem An essay on criticism. However, this idea or concept that mortals are liable to make mistakes was acknowledged as far back as Roman times when Cicero (106-43BC), the great statesman and orator, opined that “Any man can make mistakes, but only an idiot persists in his error.”
Given the fact that humans are fallible, and error is normal, it will come as no surprise that things can and often do go wrong within the world of healthcare – what are variously called patient safety incidents, adverse events, or adverse outcomes. The data would suggest that up to 2% of patients undergoing medical GP consultations1 and 10% of patients in hospitals2 have an adverse outcome, with approximately 50% of these being preventable. Although there is less research, it is highly likely that adverse events and outcomes in dentistry occur frequently as they do in medicine. A study of 1,465 severe incident reports from primary care dentistry in England and Wales identified that 23.6% of errors related to delays in treatment, 15.6% were procedural errors (including wrong tooth extraction) and 11.1% were medication related incidents.3
It is only natural to focus on the adverse outcome itself, but arguably, what is equally if not more important is trying to understand what led up to the error. Such insight can, not only, potentially help the individual clinician avoid a similar issue arising again, but more broadly can enable the profession to address any recurrent themes. So, before considering practical strategies to try and prevent or mitigate errors from happening in dentistry, it is important to understand why, or under what conditions, people make mistakes. An industry keen to understand the answer to this question was aviation, and they have identified 12 key elements that are proven to influence people into making mistakes.4 The so called ‘Dirty Dozen’ is a concept that was developed by Gordon Dupont, in 1993, while he was working for Transport Canada, and formed part of an elementary training programme for Human Performance in Maintenance. Listed in no specific order below, at first blush it is easy to see how each of these factors could contribute to human errors individually, and how in combination they could act to amplify the risk. Let us now briefly look at each of these factors in turn, and how they might relate to the world of dentistry.
1 Gaal et al. 2011
2 Lessing et al. 2010; De Vries et al. 2008
4 https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/The_Human_Factors_%22Dirty_Dozen%22
5 http://www.tac.vic.gov.au/road-safety/safe-driving/tips-and-tools/fighting-fatigue
Leave a comment