Select location
Membership information
0800 561 9000
Dentolegal advice
0800 561 1010
Menu
Refine my search

The perfect smile gone wrong

Post date: 15/07/2014 | Time to read article: 2 mins

The information within this article was correct at the time of publishing. Last updated 14/11/2018

Where aesthetics is all about the final result, making sure you and your patient are on the same page is the key to a happy ending...

A young male patient in his early twenties requested a dentist to close his midline diastema. He was getting married the following month and wanted this done before the wedding day. It was quite a large gap of some 4mm between the upper central incisors but the dentist confidently assured the young man that he could close the gap and produce ‘a perfect smile’ ready for the wedding photos.

At the next visit the patient returned, asking the dentist to prepare the two lateral incisors as well as the centrals. This was duly done and an impression was taken before the patient re-booked to return in two weeks’ time.

At the fit appointment the two central veneers were tried in and the patient agreed they looked fine. However, the dentist had not shown him all four veneers in place and had not tried them in using the try-in paste that came with the bonding kit.

The dentist went ahead anyway and cemented them in. When he looked in the mirror, the patient was surprised at the result and not at all happy with the size of the central incisors. He also felt the veneers were quite bulky under his lip. The dentist reassured him and asked him to return in a couple of weeks. 

Upset

The patient phoned the next day, having shown the veneers to his fiancée. Both were very upset with the result as they felt the front teeth were far too prominent and dominated his smile too much. With the wedding taking place in less than a fortnight, the dentist agreed to replace them at his own cost. The patient had lost confidence in the dentist by now and instead went to another who replaced the veneers for a considerably higher fee.

To resolve the case, the first dentist reimbursed the patient’s costs and Dental Protection paid for the remedial treatment and a small amount for pain and suffering and the inconvenience of having the work re-done.

Learning point:

Whenever aesthetics are involved in dentistry, it is wise to get the patient’s consent to the final appearance before completing the case, particularly if it will be difficult or expensive to redo the treatment once it has been cemented or bonded in place.

These case studies are based on real events and provided here as guidance. They do not constitute legal advice but are published to help members better understand how they might deal with certain situations. This is just one of the many benefits dental members enjoy as part of their subscription. 
For more detailed advice on any issues, contact us

Share this article

Share
Load more reviews
Rating

You've already submitted a review for this item

|
New site feature tour

Introducing an improved
online experience

You'll notice a few things have changed on our website. After asking our members what they want in an online platform, we've made it easier to access our membership benefits and created a more personalised user experience.

Why not take our quick 60-second tour? We'll show you how it all works and it should only take a minute.

Take the tour Continue to site

Dentolegal advice
0800 561 1010
Membership information
0800 561 9000

Key contact details

Should you need to contact us, our phone numbers are always visible.

Personalise your search

We'll save your profession in the "I am a..." dropdown filter for next time.

Tour completed

Now you've seen all of the updated features, it's time for you to try them out.

Continue to site
Take again