Remember that 70% of dentists in the UK alone continue to choose Dental Protection over insurance. If in doubt seek the advice and opinions of your colleagues.
Below are some of the most frequently asked questions on the issue.
Q1. What's the difference between mutual (not-for-profit) and commercial (profit-making) indemnifiers?
- Commercial organisations are profit-focused, their priority is to protect the financial interests of shareholders. In a mutual organisation the priority is the interests of the members. The wording of any insurance policy will reflect the need to define (and thereby limit) what will be covered. The terms, conditions and exclusions contained in an insurance policy will be designed to minimise risk, thereby protecting profits and the interests of shareholders rather than the policy holder.
- In contrast, the services of Dental Protection are provided by members of our dental team for members of your dental team. As part of a not-for-profit organisation, subscriptions are not set with the intention of making a profit, but simply to provide prudently for the present and future needs of the membership.
Q2. Does a contract of insurance automatically provide more certainty than discretionary indemnity?
- No. The degree of certainty will depend entirely upon the nature of the contract and its detailed wording. This determines what is included and what isn't, what exclusion clauses apply, what the terms and conditions of cover and claims are, and what the limit on cover is for each claim.
- Occurrence-based indemnity provided on a discretionary basis offers greater flexibility, and enables assistance (and compensation) to be given in circumstances which would not be covered within a contractual insurance situation. Anyone who has ever made a claim on an insurance policy for property, travel or permanent health will know that commercial insurance companies assess the claim against the carefully worded clauses of the policy. Although this is sometimes referred to as 'small print' it can have a very big impact on a claim when it is rigidly enforced.
Q3. Can't a discretionary indemnifier just refuse assistance?
- For commercial reasons, insurance companies will tend to use arguments such as this to undermine confidence in discretionary indemnity. Such an argument, while compelling at first sight, ignores the fact that an insurer can and will refuse cover if the circumstances fall outside the terms of the policy, or if the policyholder fails to comply with the conditions of the policy. Beware the bold headline statement accompanied by a tiny footnote which normally reads 'subject to the terms and conditions of the policy'.
- Any discretionary organisation that refused legitimate claims from its members would not remain in business for long. No patient who has suffered harm as a result of clinical negligence on the part of an MPS member, has ever gone uncompensated as a result of MPS exercising its discretion negatively.
Q4. What's the difference between the occurrence-based indemnity from Dental Protection and the claims-made cover offered by commercial insurance?
- Put simply, occurrence-based indemnity can meet claims that arise from treatment carried out in the past without the need for any further premium to be paid, and can protect the member in perpetuity.
- Claims-made insurance only covers you for the period for which the policy is in force. Claims from the past may have to be covered by the payment of an additional premium or run-off cover. If run-off cover is not taken out in these situations, the dentist, their estate and patients with a retrospective claim will not be protected. This is in effect a 'hidden' cost and risk of insurance.